Blog

Choose Claude Code, Codex or Google Antigravity by phone continuity, visible UI work, recovery and review time. An editor's observations, with a short trial to test your own workflow.

Opus 5.5 has lower API token rates than Opus 5. Here is how to count cache use, retries and accepted work before predicting an agent's real cost.

Before the GPT-5.5 Codex retirement, find saved model selections in defaults, agents, scheduled tasks and scripts, then test an available replacement.

A Codex credit rate is not a per-task bill. Compare Sol and Luna on accepted work, retries, review time and actual account usage.

Download ten synthetic intake cases and a pilot log. Rehearse duplicates, missing details, old prices and human handoffs before an AI workflow goes live.

Opus 5.5 changes more than the model ID. Check thinking, tool choice, fallback conversations and computer use before moving an agent to production.

Sol and Luna serve different jobs. Here is a practical way to route complex coding and focused repeatable work while measuring review time and retries.

A head-to-head coding-agent pilot should measure accepted changes, recovery, review time and actual cost under comparable task conditions.

For a client intake handoff, compare Make and n8n by who notices a failed run, how the team repairs it and whether a retry creates a duplicate task.

A useful AI pilot has a baseline, an owner, explicit review and stop rules, and a decision date. This guide shows a small team what to record before expanding a workflow.

Before comparing AI tools, count the source preparation, review, handoff and recovery work around the demo. A five-question worksheet helps a small team choose a bounded first workflow.

A shared AI notebook can help a team explain a new service, prepare a proposal or hand over background research. It can also expose more material than the sender meant to show. Check the source list before sharing the link, not after a recipient asks a question about a document they were never meant to receive.